🔗 Share this article A Chilling Documentary Review: Examining a Notorious Shooting Via the Lens of a Florida Officer's Body-Cam The real-life crime category has an innovative format, or perhaps even a whole new language and grammar: police body cam footage. Faces of victims, witnesses and potential offenders loom up to the cameras, sometimes in the intense brightness of vehicle beams or flashlights as the officers approach, their expressions and tones eloquent of caution or fear or indignation or dubiously feigned naivety. And we often incidentally glimpse the faces of the law enforcement personnel, one standing by blankly while the other conducts the inquiry with what sometimes seems like remarkable hesitation – though perhaps this is because they know they are being recorded. A Growing Trend in Non-Fiction Cinema We have already had the streaming service real-life crime film The Gabby Petito Case, about the killing of an social media personality by her partner, whose primary focus was officer recordings and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed extraordinarily lax with the suspect. There is also the acclaimed short film Incident by Bill Morrison, composed entirely of body cam film. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the tragic incident of a Florida mother in a city in Florida, a African American woman whose four young kids reportedly bothered and tormented her neighbor, Susan Lorincz. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the authorities were summoned multiple times, Lorincz fatally shot Owens through her closed front door, when Owens went to the neighbor's residence to confront her about hurling items at her children. The Police Inquiry and State Laws The investigating authorities found proof that Lorincz had done internet searches into the state's self-defense statutes, which allow residents and others to shoot if there is a reasonable belief of danger. The documentary constructs its narrative with the officer recordings captured during the repeated police visits to the scene before the killing, and then at the horrific and chaotic crime scene itself – introduced by 911 audio material of the caller calling the police in a dramatically trembling voice. There is also police cell footage of Lorincz which has a chilly, queasy fascination. Depiction of the Suspect The documentary does not really imply anything too complex about Lorincz, or any extenuating circumstance. She is clearly unstable, although the kids are heard calling her a derogatory term, an hurtful taunt. The film is showcased as an illustration of how self-defense regulations lead to senseless and tragic bloodshed. But the reality of gun ownership and the constitutional right (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a deceased pundit notoriously said made firearm fatalities a price worth paying) is not much emphasized. Officer Questioning and Gun Culture It is feasible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel astonished at how little interest the officers took in this point. When did she buy her gun? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? How was the gun kept in her home? Was it just on the couch, loaded and ready? The authorities aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they could have inquired in footage that didn’t make the edit). Or is possessing a firearm so commonplace it would be like asking about kitchen appliances or bread heaters? Arrest and Aftermath For what seemed to her neighbors a very long time, Lorincz was not even arrested and charged, only detained and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another point of comparison, incidentally, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was finally officially taken into custody in the detention area, there is an extraordinary sequence in which Lorincz simply refuses to stand, refuses to put her wrists out for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose mental health means that she just can’t do it. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point encouraged her to think that this might actually work? Conclusion and Verdict It didn’t; and the jury’s verdict is saved for the closing credits. A deeply sobering picture of American crime and punishment.